Talk:Liberty's page/@comment-213.104.16.98-20151002112917

Firstly, I agree that ‘feuds between nobles’ should be put in immediate factors that turned the possibility of conflict into a reality. This is because both of the nobles, the Percy's and the Neville's wanted to be in government. Also for government to function properly everyone has to agree with decisions made and two families in the government disagreeing would have made things a lot worse and increased the possibility of conflict. Also it did cause more issues as they couldn't both be part of the king's government so they both had to prove that they should be part of the king's government. However I do disagree with the choice to put Henry VI’s Recovery in ‘immediate factors that turned the possibility of conflict into reality’. I think that his recovery had little impact on the issues between Somerset and York because even when Henry was ill they were fighting to be the king’s protector/advisor. He may have made York even more unhappy when he let Somerset out of imprisonment and back into government which made their feud a little bigger but I feel that their feud would have continued to be bad anyway. I have reconsidered the mutual fear of Somerset and York. This is because I now don’t think that had as bigger effect on their conflict as they both disliked each other for many other reasons, but mutual fear just put on more of a chance of conflict.